Hopefully

Years ago, a friend of mine and her husband took their young son for surgery to correct a pectus excavatum, or “concave sternum.”  The condition wasn’t life threatening, but was noticeable and would likely worsen as he aged, interfering with sports or other physical activity.  He was about seven years old at the time.

The surgery involved a thin, steel rod — a knife, really — being inserted from the side of the chest, and pushed carefully behind the sternum to “pop” it out into place.  It was considered a routine procedure.

Sooner than expected, the surgeon appeared in the waiting room where my friend sat anxiously with her husband.

“We have a problem,” the doctor reported grimly.  The steel rod had accidentally nicked their son’s heart.  He was bleeding internally.

“But we think we can fix this,” the surgeon went on, and began explaining the correction they would attempt.

Stunned, my friend’s husband interrupted.  “Wait.  Wait.  Did I hear you correctly?  Did you say you think you can fix this?”

The surgeon looked him in the eye and somberly replied.  “Yes.  We think we can.”

*****

I used to say that the difference between my experience with my daughter and that of my son was that while I understood that any calamity could befall my daughter — she could get hit by a bus tomorrow — there remained a reasonable expectation that that would not happen.  It has never been so with Daniel.  Autism swept “reasonable” out of our lives.  Yet for years I sought reassurance that his life would, eventually, turn out ok, would merge onto a normal path, even, if you can imagine, that he’d be the miracle child who overcame the disorder.

I thought I’d reached a point of acceptance that such assurances are not to be, even believing I could live without them, that I’d adjusted to the constant ebb and flow of his life.  I realize now that I haven’t reached that place after all.

Several months ago my son’s group home manager, Kristen, regretfully informed me that Daniel could no longer be safely cared for at his current residence, the home we’ve loved, where he’s seemed to flourish for two and a half years.  They felt they had no choice but to give the obligatory “30-day notice” that a new placement for our son was necessary.

This shouldn’t have come as the blow it did.  There had been incidents, serious ones, during the last few months.  In February, Daniel’s beverage obsession drove him to drink windshield wiper fluid he’d spotted in a neighbor’s garage.  He spent three days in the hospital undergoing dialysis to flush the toxin from his system.  Just weeks later, he eloped to another neighbor’s house, barged through their front door, and began guzzling from a gallon of milk in their refrigerator.

I knew about these episodes, even recognized uneasily that they were escalating.  Despite his challenges, however, we’ve been happy with the overall quality of his life, the attention he receives, grateful for the opportunities he’s had to experience at least some of the larger world.  He enjoys a unique, hard-won bond with his primary caregiver.  It’s been the best place Daniel has lived for years.

Yet in retrospect I wonder if I’d been intentionally blind, unable to face the inevitable consequences of behaviors we’ve struggled for years to understand, desperate for a break from the relentless worry of parenting a severely autistic child.  Distracted, too, by the demands of running for re-election for my job as township clerk, perhaps I could handle only so much stress at a time.  Was the campaign my excuse to shut my eyes, for a few precious months, to the chronic challenges autism presents, even as my subconscious warned of a crisis, the culmination of fears I’ve harbored for his lifetime?

Kristen described an alternative they had in mind, a “one-on-one” placement ten minutes from his current home.  The new house would be equipped with an electromagnetic locking system to prevent elopements, a feature unavailable in his current home, designated as an unlocked facility.  His care team would transfer with him, lessening the impact of the move.

Everyone, she told me, agreed that this arrangement is what Daniel needs, for his own safety and that of others: his case supervisor at the managed care organization we work with to oversee his residential needs, their behaviorist, their nurse.  Everyone except the contract department, which controls the flow of funding.  They rejected it as too expensive, and directed the MCO to look elsewhere, to find another agency, another Adult Family Home, otherwise known as a group home, capable of managing Daniel.

“We want to keep Daniel with us,” Kristen told me.  “His behaviors are difficult, and we don’t want him to end up in Southern.”  She was referring to a multi-bed facility in southern Wisconsin, the kind of sprawling institution that’s the stuff of nightmares for parents like me.

I should have known these words were coming, words I told myself again and again to prepare for.

But I wasn’t prepared.  I wasn’t ready to learn that yet another living situation had failed, that his behavior was more than even this capable staff could handle, that we needed to start again.

I wasn’t ready to hear the word “institution” in relation to my son.

*****

That night I had to attend a campaign function featuring a national political figure, and set aside my panic over Daniel to interact with nearly a hundred jovial attendees.  I don’t know how I did it, but it must have been effective; my emotional shut-down carried through the weekend.  I didn’t — simply couldn’t — talk to anyone, not my closest friend or even my daughter, unable to face questions for which I had no answers, or probe a situation that left me breathless.  Holding the knot of fear and despair inside my chest was easier than facing it, than acknowledging again the powerlessness I’ve so often experienced in the course of Daniel’s life.

My husband understood this.  When I came home from work the following Tuesday he was on the phone, speaking to the supervisor of the managed care agency, trying to gather information on what came next, how we could fight the denial of the alternative our agency had offered.  He was told emphatically that the proposed home was not an option, but that the MCO would begin a search for another placement for our son.

“Hopefully,” she added, “it will be an Adult Family Home.”

“What does that mean?” I asked frantically when Andy hung up the phone.  “What does she mean, ‘hopefully’ an Adult Family Home?  As opposed to what?”

He didn’t need to answer.  I already knew.

*****

I’ve spent weeks reflecting on why that word crushed me as it did, why it evoked the opposite of its intention, that of encouragement, optimism, possibility.  I remember the desolation that washed over me, the certainty that no matter the outcome of this latest challenge, this particular piece of shitty, that there would be more to come; that after all these years nothing has become easier, we are still battling a war we can’t win.  We are still only at hopefully.

And hopefully isn’t enough where your child is concerned, yet that’s what we’ve been working with for years.  Now my longstanding fear that we’d lose my beautiful, bright and loving son to an institution was an actual possibility.  The shadowy menace held in the dark of my heart had taken shape, ready and waiting.

Autism is years of hopefullys, of fervent, desperate prayers that the next situation, or therapy, or medication, will make a difference, only to face again the inescapable truth that the disorder is lifelong.  “Hopefully” had turned on me, and I hid in my insulated bubble of mute fear for weeks as the situation unfolded, paralyzed, unable to write, or even discuss it with family or friends.

It had beaten me.  I was done.

Except we don’t get to be done when we’re parents.

*****

To explain the bureaucracy involved in the resolution of this crisis would take pages, and this blog is too long already.  Suffice it to say that things got worse before they got better.  The neighbors whose house Daniel had busted into back in March had called the police, and eventually the local newspaper.  Articles were published calling my son’s actions a “home invasion,” which left the occupant “traumatized.”  Readers commented online, including one who opined that people “like that” should not be allowed in the community but in institutions where they belong.

For several weeks it appeared that the only agency willing to accept our notorious son was a brand-new outfit in Fond du Lac, two hours further north, operating just one home, a dim, cramped, duplexed house with no fenced yard and owners comfortable with “restraint” when necessary.

It took two agonizing months, but in the end we got what we wanted.  Andy tells me that I played it perfectly, breaking from my paralysis precisely when necessary to move the process toward our goal.  I don’t know if that’s true, or if we were just lucky.  The owner of our current agency reduced the service rate originally proposed, leaving the contract department no excuse to deny his placement in the alternative house.  Daniel moved to his new, secure home a few days ago.  He seems comfortable there, happy.

On that first awful night of Kristen’s call, Daniel’s father Jeff told me to hang in there.  “Things always work out for Dan Man,” he reminded me.  I don’t have such trust in a larger plan right now, unable to forget the fundamental truth that things didn’t work out so well for Daniel, that his life was royally screwed before he ever had a chance.  I tell myself that I won’t be duped again.

A few weeks ago, though, Andy and I drove by the new house, which I’d toured but Andy hadn’t yet seen.  It’s a tidy, light-filled home with a swing in the backyard.  I can picture Daniel there, swaying gently as he blows his bubbles, shaded by the maple tree behind him, his aide Brittany by his side.

On our way back to the highway we passed a park where Daniel and I had shared a picnic two years ago, and without thinking I exclaimed, “Look!  That’s where we came that first summer!”  I laughed with exuberance. “Maybe, when things settle down, we can go there again…”

Hope remains resilient.  Or so it seems.

 

My friends’ son survived the accident on the operating table, and is now a handsome, heathy 27-year-old.

Good Enough

The day before she planned to board a plane to Chicago for Christmas, my sister-in-law tripped on the stairs of her home, tumbling all the way to bottom.  Fortunately, she was able to call a neighbor, who drove her to the hospital, where doctors diagnosed a nasty concussion and badly sprained ankle.

Advised not to fly for at least a week, she spent the holiday alone, half a country away from the family who loved her.  It was not the annual reunion any of us had hoped for.

It could have been so much worse, of course, as we told ourselves repeatedly over the next few days.  Living alone, she may have lain unconscious for hours before someone found her.  She could have been permanently injured, even killed.  The possibilities don’t bear thinking of.

She was, in fact, lucky.  Yet luck is a relative term.

I’ve struggled with this kind of contradiction often since my son’s diagnosis, seeking the bright side, the countless positives in Daniel’s life to counter the implacable weight of autism.  These self-imposed pep talks seldom evoke the level of gratitude I believe I should feel, however, or appreciation for the grace I’ve been granted, again and again.  How often have I told myself that what I have, what my son has, should be enough, even as my self-pity shouts me down: “Of course it could be worse!  Of course it could!  But it’s bad enough as it is!”

Slowly, though, I’m emerging from this kind of wallowing.  This past Christmas I realized that, perhaps, I’m making some progress after all.  And I don’t know how I feel about that.  It’s taken me weeks to wrestle my emotions into cohesion.

We brought Daniel home for a day visit on Christmas Eve, an excursion we haven’t attempted in several years.  It’s easier on everyone, including him, to simply celebrate at his group home in Wisconsin, rather than tempt the erratic behavior that makes his living there necessary with transitions back and forth from the environment he’s grown accustomed to over the years.

This year, however, I decided to try again.

The holiday season is not particularly joyful for me, and despite my grim resolve each year to make it so, over the last decade it’s become a period to be endured rather than savored.  Exceptional work demands at the close of last year had me more anxious than ever, and a wise friend urged me to set aside, just this once, a few of the traditions I’ve felt duty bound to maintain, even as they brought more stress than satisfaction.  I tried to take her advice.  Christmas 2016, for instance, marked the first year since my children were born that I didn’t include their photo with my Christmas cards.  And what do you know?  The world survived, just fine.

Maybe this frame of mind helped ratchet down my expectations for Daniel’s visit, let go just a bit of my perfectionism and take the day as it came.  It didn’t have to be perfect; almost certainly it wouldn’t be.  And indeed, it wasn’t.

My Facebook post that afternoon painted an idyllic portrait of family togetherness, drawing supportive comments from my circle of friends.  My daughter, her boyfriend, and their enchanting puppy were home as well; we dined at Denny’s, Daniel’s favorite restaurant, and exchanged gifts around a glowing Christmas tree.

Pictures rarely tell the whole story, of course.

I’d planned to give Daniel his Christmas stocking, bulging with favored treats, before leaving for lunch, but he showed little interest, leaping from the sofa and pointing to the door — “Denneh?  Denneh?” — again and again until we tossed the stocking aside in resignation.

At the restaurant he was allowed soda to his heart’s content, but this did nothing to slake his obsession with the beverage, demanding more as soon as we got back in the car.  Nine years after leaving Illinois, he still remembers the precise location of the grocery store nearest our house, and pointed in its direction as we drove quickly home, praying he wouldn’t wet his pants before we got there, a very real possibility due to his public bathroom aversion.

Back in the living room once again, we tried enticing him with the mountain of merrily wrapped gifts assembled under the tree. He was having none of it.  “Stoar?  Stoar?”  His requests became more belligerent as I tried coaxing him with a sticker book, my well-stocked refrigerator sadly lacking the 16-ounce bottle he apparently had in mind.

“Stoar!”

One photo I posted on Facebook was especially popular, my once-little boy now towering over me, hands on my shoulders, looking deeply into my eyes as I smiled up at him with joy.  It elicited tender comments from far and wide.

“I can see the love in this picture!”

“You are his world!”

“This picture says so much!”

It said plenty, all right.  It said our whole happy Christmas visit had been hijacked by Daniel’s unremitting obsession; that I was desperate for the holiday’s magic to break the vicious hold of autism for just one day.  That as that photo was snapped, he’d just released my chin after pulling my face to his, laser-focusing as he repeated, again and again, “Stoar?  Stoar?  Stoar?”

We gave in.  Armed with a bottle of Coke Zero chosen from the gas station minimart, Daniel finally relaxed, giggling, posing for photos, enjoying time with his family before Andy drove him, happy and willing, back to his Wisconsin home.

It was an exhausting afternoon, another celebration driven by the disorder that has dictated the course of our lives.  But while the day failed to unfold as smoothly as I had hoped, it didn’t crush me as some past Christmas ordeals have done.

I don’t know why this was so.  Was it because my daughter was so obviously happy, or that her boyfriend touched me so deeply with his maturity, his affection and respect for his girlfriend’s special brother?  Was it the joy of their dog Mattie’s exuberance, the fun of having a puppy in the house?  Was it that we made it through lunch at a restaurant without incident, no hapless diner’s soda wrenched from their unsuspecting hands?

Did the positive, this time, simply outweigh the negative?

I can hardly believe it’s that easy, because I don’t do simple very well.  Separating my feelings around Daniel’s disability from the rest of my life is an ongoing challenge; his autism colors everything in my world.  With Daniel’s struggles so blatantly on display, enjoying a festive holiday feels like a betrayal, acceptance a sell out to my own longing for harmony, for normalcy, for simple. Daniel’s reality is my own, and conceding that it is good enough is defeat, like giving up on a Christmas photo.

A mere bottle of soda satisfied my son, but that wasn’t the way I wanted it: I wanted my will for Daniel to prove stronger than his fixation, than his disorder itself.  That kind of transformation doesn’t happen very often with autism.  I know this by now.  I still hope for it, though, unwilling to accept circumstances as they are because they could be, should be, so much better.

Yet this year I felt the grace of truth more powerfully: those circumstances could be worse.

And I hold these truths now as well: Daniel’s smile as he ran from Andy’s car to our back door, beaming, eager to be home again; his delight as Mattie pranced on his bed, licking his hands and face while I tightened his shoelaces and brushed back his hair.  His careful examination of the tree ornaments, touching, tapping, as he did when he was a boy.  His willingness to return at the end of the day to the life he knows now and embraces, untroubled, secure in our bond and our love.

For a few hours on Christmas our family was together.  Imperfect, stumbling, winging it, but together.

And this time — dare I say it? — that was good enough.

Pizza, interrupted

eye-watching-you-707028

It should have been a good visit.  My son had been asking for me all week — “Mah?  Mah?” — and even had an outing in mind. “Pee-zah!” he’d declared, again and again.  “Mah?  Pee-zah?”  It seemed he couldn’t wait to see me.

As soon as Daniel spotted me, though, I knew something was off.  Rushing toward me demanding “pop,” he gestured to the soda dispensers near the front of the restaurant.  His beverage obsession is nothing new, and extra soda is a treat he anticipates when I visit.  It’s one of the few pleasures he asks of me, a modest joy I’ve willingly indulged through eight years of structured residential care.

His aide, Brittany, however, was telling him no.

“Uh-uh.  No way,” she said firmly.  “You’re having juice.”  My heart sank, realizing he must have stolen a soda, coffee, or other random beverage that morning, and now had to pay the price.  And I knew we’d pay the price with him.  His conflict with his caregiver would infect our time together, too.

Daniel grasped my chin, forcing me to look him in the eye.  “Pop?” he repeated desperately, his dismay and frustration palpable. “Pop!”

“I don’t know how we’re going to do this without soda,” I told Brittany, longing to grant his simple wish, fearing an ugly, public scene if I let him down.  She seemed to waver, then shook her head decisively.

“You can have juice, or we can go home right now,” she told my son.  “You rather go home?”  She pointed toward the door.

“No!” he cried in alarm, throwing off his coat as he flung himself into the booth my husband and I had claimed.

Would Daniel even understand the connection, I wondered, between stealing pop at his group home, and being denied it now, with me?  Brittany’s consequence may do nothing but taint the few hours we had with him.  We’d reached a no-win situation five minutes into our visit.

We’re in a unsettled place these days.  My son’s aides manage him as I no longer can, and I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. I am his mother, but no longer his caregiver; his most ardent advocate, yet outside his circle of daily life.  Their fondness for Daniel is obvious, but tempered by a professional objectivity I can never provide.  His team aims for the long term; I live for the fleeting moments of tenderness, of meaningful contact with my son.

He wasn’t fooled by the paper cup holding the Hi-C I dutifully poured for him instead of the Diet Coke he’d been counting on. He knew he’d been cheated. I felt cheated, too, yet obliged to support Brittany’s authority, authority we granted by placing Daniel in her care.

He tore through the sticker book I’d brought him, scattering its pages across the table, requesting pop every few minutes, clenching his hands in anger when we told him no.  Andy tried to calm him, squeezing Daniel’s hands in his own as he’s done for years to soothe him.  But our merry visit was going south fast.

Making matters worse, we’d caught the attention of a young girl sitting with her parents a few booths away.  I noticed her furtive glances when we first sat down, and imagined her mother’s whispered explanation of Daniel’s likely disability, her admonishment not to stare.

Unfortunately, the girl couldn’t seem to resist.

She peered over her shoulder compulsively, regarding Daniel like an exotic carnival attraction.  Cautious at first, she quickly grew bolder, staring opening as the minutes ticked by.

Annoyed, I caught and held her eye.  I’m on to you, toots.  Knock it off.

She returned my stare unabashed for a good ten seconds, finally dropping her gaze, only to renew surveillance of Daniel moments later. When her mother left the table briefly, she shifted position, stretching her legs across the seat to observe the spectacle more comfortably.  Her father, meanwhile, was oblivious, his nose stuck in his phone.

I reported this all to Andy and Brittany, who were sitting with their backs to the girl.

“How old do you think she is?” I asked Brittany, whose own children are eight and nine.  Perhaps I was expecting more courtesy than a child her age could reasonably demonstrate.

“Oh, she’s old enough to know better,” proclaimed Brittany, glancing behind her.  “She must be 11 or 12.  She definitely ought to know better.”

I met the girl’s eyes again, my disapproval pulsing across the few yards between us.  She stared back, her expression an unsettling cross of innocence and cunning.  She knew, I was sure, that staring at my son was wrong, perhaps even distressing. But she did it anyway.  I couldn’t imagine my own daughter behaving this way in the face of such obvious adult reproach.  It was disconcerting, creepy, even, her brazen gaze an unwelcome spotlight on an already strained, dispirited experience.

Perhaps I’d known from the start that something would blow that day.  Or maybe it was the epic struggle for Andy’s drink that broke me.

One momentary lapse of vigilance, and Daniel had snatched the forbidden cup and began sucking frantically on its straw.  Andy grabbed back and a tug-of-war ensued, my husband the final victor, but not before iced tea had splashed across the table and onto Daniel’s lap.

Tossing a sodden napkin aside, I looked up to find the girl’s gleeful attention glued to the bizarre scene we presented: a 24-year-old “normal” appearing man’s frenzied struggle with his stepfather over a soda cup in a pizza parlor.

“That’s it,” I muttered, abruptly rising from our booth.

Alarm and guilt washed over the mother’s flushed face as I stood before their table.

“Your daughter has been staring at my son since the moment we got here,” I said in a low, controlled voice.  “He is severely autistic and I understand his behavior is unusual.  But we are trying to share a meal with him.  And apparently your daughter doesn’t understand that it is rude to stare at disabled people.”

Without waiting for a reply I returned to my seat.  Glancing up, I saw the girl’s face crumpling as she met her mother’s appalled glare, and heard her belated whimpering: “I’m sorry!  I’m sorry!”

I looked down at our napkin strewn table.

“I think she’s apologizing,” Brittany murmured, but I didn’t look up.  I didn’t want an apology.  I just wanted her to stop staring at my son.

Did I do the right thing?  Did I overreact?  A friend noted that I could have used the episode as teaching moment, sharing insight into autism and disabilities in general.  Our outing could have ended on an positive note.

Honestly, though?  I wasn’t inclined to teach that insolent girl a damn thing.  My son’s dignity trumped sensitivity training by a mile.  Whether or not Daniel was aware of the scrutiny didn’t matter a bit; I knew.  My role in his life has diminished, but my instinct to protect him was what mattered in that moment.  I’m surprised I didn’t go further, and scream at her out loud:  Stop looking at him, you horrid little brat!  He can’t help it, he can’t help it and neither can I!  This disorder has consumed us both.

Yet I’ve plucked at the layers of this drama a dozen times this week, revealing more questions than answers.  Did I lash out merely to assert authority over a ill-behaving child because I’ve lost control of my own?  Had I simply unleashed my impotent sorrow, recognizing that transitory moments are all I have left with my son, and one more of these had been stolen by the disorder that rules our lives?

Will my rebuke help that girl in the long run, kindle a new awareness or compassion?  Or had I simply punished her for bearing witness to our pain?

Was this, in truth, less about my son than it was about me?  Can I possibly separate the two?

Daniel’s care team is playing a long game now; I just want to be his mother for a few precious hours, untethered by rules or consequences or procedures, to engage him on my own terms.  Yet I don’t know if my terms are sustainable.  I fear alienating the people we are dependent on, who care well for my son, who we are indeed luckier than many to have found.  Who am I to question their approach when they’ve shown Daniel a fuller life in the last 12 months than he has experienced in years?

There are no easy answers here.  Yet I feel compelled to reclaim my place, my own authority, to form a new set of rules for the two of us, supporting our relationship as mother and son.

I have only my heart to guide me.  But that will have to be enough.

 

Who’ll Stop the Rain

Rain

In my experience, few endeavors have less effect than telling a worrier not to worry, as the years I’ve lost to fruitless anxiety demonstrate.  Apparently, I needn’t worry that I’m alone, however, as Googling the word produces 391,000,000 hits.  We are a world of worriers.

Yet as my friend, the writer Robert Hughes, points out, “I think everybody can say with Montaigne, ‘My life has been full of terrible misfortunes most of which never happened.’”

Concurring with this assessment, though, seldom prevents me from clouding days with one worry or another, my list of what ifs and potential calamities far-reaching and often irrational.  It’s become such a part of me I hardly consider trying to change.

A recent bout with my most familiar nemesis led me to consider, though: could I at least try to embrace a less fatalistic approach, to consider the wisdom of annoying but accurate platitudes like, “Worry is like walking around with an umbrella waiting for it to rain”?

Such an apt simile, after all.  Rain, and the damage it may cause, is one of my most visceral fears.  It’s unstoppable, beyond human control, potentially ruinous.  The menacing possibilities my imagination can conjure are boundless where rain is concerned.  As a co-worker unwittingly reinforced, “Water always finds a way in!”

My phobia reached its peak in the spring of 2014, following a grueling winter of near-record cold and snowfall, the back of which every Chicagoan longed to see.  Everyone except me, that is.  The promise of spring promised me only the melting of the massive snowbanks directly into the basement of my charming but porous 90-year-old home.  I worried about the watery consequences incessantly, for weeks on end.

Given how infrequently we’ve had more than a few trickles in the 14 years we’ve lived here, even I recognized this obsession as absurd.  I couldn’t stop myself, though.  The leaky episodes we had experienced kept me watchful, wary, filled with dread whenever rain was foretold.

That spring was lost to me, my anxiety gathering like the whopping, snow-melting storm forecasters gleefully predicted for a Thursday in early April.  I’d prepared as best I could: old towels lined trouble spots, rags and buckets were near to hand.  Home from work after the day-long deluge, I braced myself at the top of the basement stairs, Odysseus facing a hostile, enemy-strewn shore.

“Be strong, saith my heart;” I recited bravely, “I am a soldier; I have seen worse sights than this.”

*****

We all have fears, real and imagined, some of which we allow to cripple us. My friend Marla Davishoff, a talented therapist, assures me I’m not alone in this particular fear; many people, women especially, feel anxiety around water and their homes. Perhaps it involves the instinct to protect our nests, our flocks.  I can scarcely recall my temperament before adulthood brought responsibility beyond my own narrow concerns, beyond caring for myself alone.  Have I really been this nervous my whole life, this irrational about problems that, while tiresome, are most certainly not the end of the world?  Whatever damage our house may sustain, we have the resources to fix it, however inconvenient that may be.  Yet when the familiar panic creeps in, I chide myself in vain: “What’s the worst that can happen?”  Plenty, my anxious mind replies.

Such frivolous worry, of course, is also just a tad self-centric, cowardly, even.  How selfish to waste so much energy on foolish fears as society reels with more sobering concerns, while I, in fact, have more serious concerns myself.  Real, life-altering concerns.

For years I thought controlling at least my physical environment would help quell the chaos of autism, the daily upset and fear, the desperate need to help my son without knowing how.  I’ve justified, too, my phobias as necessary stand-ins for the vast intangibles that have shrouded our lives since Daniel’s diagnosis, staving off a flood of legitimate, long-term worry too serious and heartbreaking to absorb.  Worry needs an outlet somewhere; how much easier to shoot rabidly at identifiable targets than the elusive, mercurial enemy that has shaped my son’s life, and my own?

For me, and many parents like me, diagnosis of profound disability in our children skews our image of a rational, predictable world.  Life “working out for the best” becomes a naive, unjustified banality, rhetoric like “What’s the worst that can happen?” scant reassurance when your child’s future, his whole existence, is at stake.

I know powerlessness now, that circumstances exist beyond my control despite pleas and prayers and promises; that love alone is not healer enough; that some losses will never be redeemed.  Autism stole Daniel’s life the day he was born, the fullness of normal experience he should have had lost to fate, or chance, or an arbitrary bestowing I’ll never comprehend.

He appears content these days.  In many ways he is thriving.  But I know all that he is missing.  I can’t abandon the worry over what his heart holds, the unexpressed dreams he may harbor that will never be fulfilled.  He is blessed with health and energy and curiosity, a family that loves him, yet he faces a lifetime of inequitable challenges through no fault of his own.  This truth is as sure as rain.  It will always find a way in.  Yet I keep trying to stem the tide.

I wonder if I’m on the right track about any of this, if these insights are really just a convoluted excuse for behavior that’s merely habitual, perversely comforting even as it cripples me.  Have the years of doubt and concern, of questions and faltering, imperfect solutions, warped me so indelibly that I no longer know how to live without worry?

I guess I needn’t worry over the why.  The possibility of change, my fledgling yearning for it and the hard work it involves, is concern enough for now.

******

As you may have guessed, our basement didn’t flood two years ago.  A few rogue rivulets escaped my towel barriers, easily wiped away.  I wasted that whole spring for nothing, fretting away moment after moment, hour after hour, until a whole season had passed, over an event that never occurred.

A few months ago we had the drain tiles in our basement replaced.  It was an expensive undertaking, postponed for years until my daughter was through graduate school and Daniel’s residential placement was, at least for now, secure.  Just after Christmas we added a backup sump pump system, to protect us even during power failures.  Marla optimistically predicts that these improvements will lay my water worries to rest, once and for all.

I was huddled on our screened porch a few weeks ago while the four cats we care for ate the breakfast I provide them each morning.  Andy’s allergies prevent us from bringing them inside, but our porch has been their home base for six years, and we’ve made it their sanctuary.

Sipping my coffee, I reflected that it will be months, perhaps years, before I descend the basement stairs without trepidation at what might be seeping across the floor, but I’ll be working on it, one step at a time.

This hopeful moment was punctuated by a piece of ceiling plaster falling on my head.

The porch roof seems to have developed a weak spot.

My time in the deep end over this new threat passed more quickly than you might imagine, more in proportion to the relative gravity of the problem.  A roofer was called.  A temporary fix was installed, protecting our porch and our cats, until we can address the issue come spring.

I’ve got this.

Not yet a soldier, but standing fast.

This time, at least.

Camels in Wisconsin

Kids at Botanic Garden

My close and very wise friend Marla reminds me sometimes that, as parents, we are only ever as happy as our least happy child.

Which is problematic when a) you’re as co-dependent as I am, and b) children are a never-ending source of angst all around.

Oh, they are the wellspring of all that is most beautiful in our lives, as well.  I’m acutely aware of how fortunate I am to be a mother; I can’t imagine who I’d be without my children.  And therein lies the rub.

My equilibrium — because I’m old enough to know that “happiness” isn’t really the goal after all — is irrevocably tied to that of my children’s, as it is for most of the parents I know.

Aside from the advocacy role I’ve assumed on my son’s behalf, I don’t think I’m an overbearing parent; I’ve allowed them room to mature and explore, in different ways, while remaining close and involved in their lives, even as they’ve grown up and away.

My peace of mind, though, is dependent on their lives being steady, on track, on being good.  I’ve never learned that trick we are told to embrace as our children reach adulthood, that letting go thing I’ve heard about.  I wonder how many parents really have.

Instead, I ride each wave, every turbulent passage of my kids’ lives, feeling the ebb and flow of their experiences as deeply as my own.

There are times, though, when I wish I could disengage, when I imagine what a relief it would be to do so.

Often since my son’s move early this year I’ve considered our relationship, and my aspirations for him, the goals modified, adjusted or abandoned over time.  His diagnosis 21 years ago was the beginning of the end of almost every dream I had, back when his future seemed as boundless as my love for him.

No divine flash of acceptance acclimated me to the very different life in store for him than that which I’d mapped out so cleverly in my mind.  Submission occurred over years, covert moments of resignation so subtle I often didn’t even recognize their import, the setting aside of one dream, and yielding to another.

He’s living one of those altered dreams now, in a group home tailored and responsive to his unique needs.  His behaviors are accommodated, worked on, proactively addressed.  He is experiencing a fuller world than I’d dared hope for just a year ago.

Why, then, is it yet so difficult to view his life now as the fulfillment of at least one dream I’ve held on to, a circumstance realized after years of uncertainty and despair?

A few weeks ago I received a photo of Daniel taken at the Racine County Fair, which he attended with one of his specially trained aides.  Teeming with crowds and tempting distractions, it was an outing I wouldn’t have dared navigate on my own.

But there he was, engaged and laughing in the summer sun, sitting atop a camel.

He was clutching a boxy, harness-like contraption designed, apparently, to facilitate balance on the camel’s hump, giggling, it seemed, at the absurdity of his position, but enjoying it just the same.

My quirky, unpredictable son was riding a camel.

Laughing out loud in delight, I quickly composed a reply to Daniel’s case manager, who’d sent us the photo.

“Of all the dreams I’ve had for Daniel through the years, riding a camel was never one of them.  Seeing this picture, though, I can’t imagine why not!”

I recognized in that moment how bound I am to my old ideas of how life ought to be for my son, for both my children; what will bring them fulfillment, comfort, or — dare I say it? — happiness.  I understood, too, that so many of my dreams for both of them are my ideals, and mine alone, shaped through years of my own experience and regret, my own longings and missed opportunities.  The finely crafted hopes and dreams I have for my children may, in reality, bear little likeness to their own ideals at all.

How liberating this moment should have been.  How freeing to discern that my children, now adults, can — in fact, must — take the reins themselves, albeit in very different ways, weighing the worth of their experiences by their own standards, their own views on the meaning of “happiness.”  I really could let go at last.

Naturally, it didn’t work quite that way for me.  Lifetime habits are not so easily cast aside.  From my camel epiphany emerged a prickly, peevish reaction that I’ve struggled for weeks to articulate, a sullen acknowledgment of how desperately I would like events to proceed, just once, precisely the way I want them to.

Now that would be liberating.

How horribly self-centered, and how very common: We all want what we want when we want it.  But, oh, to have respite from the worry, the chronic concern over their welfare, their progress, their lives, which mean more to me than my own.  And I’m capable of convincing myself that this would be possible if they’d just follow those paths familiar and comfortable to me, if their lives, so vulnerable and fragile, so critical to my own, played out within the safety of my own comfort zone.

Screw the road less traveled.  I want my children traveling roads I’ve walked for them for years, if only in my dreams, whether they are roads of their choosing or not.

Oh, I know where this tantrum comes from, this petulant demand for a guarantee.  I’ve had enough of uncharted terrain, of stumbling along dark roads, praying for a lucid, benevolent end.  I want convention, the known, even if it’s known only in my fantasy.  How much safer than the fathomless range of possibility, all manner of depravity and disappointment, of suffering and loss the world may casually throw their way.

I want to let my guard down, to sink into the shelter of the way things were supposed to be.

And this is the crux of it, what it’s taken me the nine months since Daniel’s move to accept: that I expected his new life to be different than it’s turned out to be.  I thought I’d relax now that he is in competent, professional hands, and in many ways I have. But this transition has new complications, as well, fresh heartbreaks to adjust to, more painful because I didn’t see them coming. His life is better, infinitely better than it was, but not precisely as I’d hoped it would be.

The better part doesn’t include me.  And being a better part of his life again is precisely what I’ve been dreaming of for years.

Fortunately, I don’t often act on this selfishness.  I am living with the ache of feeling like an outsider when I visit my son, knowing I’ll never be the center of his world again.  I concede that, at least for now, his behavior deteriorates when I am with him, that our relationship is a trigger for the issues we are trying to curb.  I’m trying my best to accept that his need for me is diminishing, and that is how it should be, even though it feels like a loss I simply can’t bear.

I support with all my heart decisions I once could not have imagined my daughter making on her own, finding her way with confidence and grace.  I applaud her independence, knowing each new decision takes her a step further from the protective embrace of my influence.  I believe she knows that I’ll be behind her no matter what choices she makes, if she fails or succeeds; that she can always run back to me even as she’s pulling away; that I will be her champion for the rest of my days.

Weeks of agitation later, I understand that I’m here again, in another stage of letting go; it caught me unaware, as it’s done so many times before.  These periods have taught me, though, that any new experience surrounding my children can feel threatening, their lives in relation to mine in the balance, as I struggle to find my own place, my equilibrium, again.

My desire to hide, to look away from the bright new paths they may follow almost overwhelms me at times.  Who knows the distance those paths may carry them?  It is simply too painful to contemplate.

But holding them back would be more painful still.